ConclusionHerzberg’s Two-Factor Theory has widely used on variety of motivational researches across different industries and generations. The extra point of Herzberg’s Two-Factor theory because it provides an integration of individuals’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation factors that is able to ideally cover other motivation theories. Motivation and hygiene factors introduced by Herzberg have found similarities among other motivation theories under content theories as each theory carries various employees’ need for motivation in similar terms (Borkowski, 2011). In detail, Responsibilities, Achievements, Growth, Promotion, Recognition and Work Itself categorised under Herzberg’s motivation factors have found similar with Maslow’s Self Actualization and Self Esteem, and Alderfer’s Growth need, as well as McClelland’sNeed of Achievements. Relationship with Peers. Personal Life, Supervision categorised under Herzberg’s hygiene factors consistent with Maslow’s Belongingness, Alderfer’s Relatedness need, and McClelland’s need of Affiliation. Factor of Status under hygiene factors is similar with Need for Power under McClelland’s Theory of Need. Lastly. Pay and Benefit, Work Condition, Job Security and Company Policy and Administration are also found consistent with Maslow’s Safety and Physiological Need and Alderfer’s Existence need. As results, compare to the other Motivational Theories, Two-Factor Theory provides more comprehensive sets of factors that cover basic individual internal and external needs to exert their additional efforts into jobs.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
