Tesla vs. HertzTesla was not a theoretician by calling, but he made plenty of observations on the electrical nature ofthe universe that put him at odds with of official theory. In fashion then (and even now) was the theoryof Heinrich Hertz, an interpreter of the physics of James Maxwell. Hertz explained radio propagation astransverse waves akin to light. Tesla was convinced that radio disturbances were standing waves inthe ether akin to sound. When you drop a pebble into water, the disturbances you see in the form ofconcentric circles are standing waves.Both Tesla and Hertz assumed the existence of an aetheric medium, but differed as to its energytransmitting properties. Tesla believed that the ether was a gas like medium, that electric propagationwas very much like that of sounds in air, alternate compression's and rarefaction's of the medium, andthat Hertzian waves could only take place in a solid medium. Tesla once said that Hertz waves areradiation and that no energy could be economically transmitted to a distance by any such agency. Hesaid, In my system, the process is one of true conduction which can be effected at the greatestdistance without appreciable loss.When quantum physics and particle theory came into vogue, the aetheric medium was dropped out ofelectric theory altogether, but Hertz's theory was more compatible with the new concepts ofpropagation and therefore survived. By way of rubbing this in, the unit of frequency, formerly cycles persecond (cps), was renamed in honor of Hertz (Hz), while only an obscure unit of magnetic flux densityremembers Tesla. It is in respect to Tesla that I have reverted to the old unit in this book. Hertzianradio is straight-line, light-like radiation's that bounce off hills and mountains. Long distance Hertziantransmissions are explained in terms of radiation's bouncing off a radio reflective upper layer called theionosphere. Tesla thought this was all nonsense and declared in 1919 that Hertzian thinking has stifledcreative effort in the wireless art and retarded it for 25 years. Hertzian radio is aerial.Most of us are conditioned to thinking in terms of aerial radio; the air waves, on the air. Tesla's radio isgrounded; the lower end of the energized coil is rooted in the earth. Pure Hertzian radio has no suchhttp://www.frank.germano.com/lostinventions.htm (17 of 28)2004/11/22 09:47:22 AMthe lost inventions of Nikola Teslanatural load. Tesla doesn't speak of antennas as such; the element he places aloft is an elevatedcapacity. Tesla said radio devices should be designed with due regard to the physical properties of thisplanet and the electrical conditions obtaining in same. Grounded radio is indeed more powerful thanthe Hertzian aerial. But this is true particularly for the frequencies Tesla was using. The higherfrequencies do behave in a Hertzian manner. Yet grounding is all but a lost concept in consumerelectronics. Up through the 1940's, AM radio receivers customarily had a terminal one wasencouraged to connect to a cold water pipe or other deep earth connection. Ground the chassis of anyof today's receivers, and, unless there is some kind of interference coming up through the ground(from fluorescent circuits, light dimmers, which are oscillators, or from the local Tesla coil), you willusually improve signal strength and range.Among Tesla's contributions to radio was remote control. Tesla demonstrated a radio-controlled boatbefore crowds at Madison Square Gardens and sent another robot craft 25 miles up the Hudson River.Grounded radio works particularly well through water. Tesla's basic radio tuning tank circuit forreceiving (coil plus capacitor between antenna and ground) was, and is, all by itself, a powerful signalamplifier, and a beautifully simple one, at that. But as radio developed over the years, the tank circuitshrank in size and the result was a loss in gain. This was compensated for by the addition of stageupon stage of complex amplification circuitry.Tesla watched this development with bewilderment. Tesla knew that the most efficient long-distanceradio took place in the lower frequencies, especially those close to the earth-resonant frequency.Frequencies well below the AM broadcast band were the favored ham frequencies in the early daysprior to World War I. In fact, waves of 600 meters (500 kc) were considered short while consideredfairly long were the waves of 1200 meters (25 kc). Like a lot of good real estate, many of these moreradio-effective frequencies below the AM broadcast band have been appropriated for military use, butalso for navigation beacons, weather stations, and time registers.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
