Indeed, if we are committed to achieving the goal of thePacific Century, we cannot ignore the fact that despite ourregion's optimism and its overall prosperity, some countriesare burdened by crippling debt levels and appear to be doinglittle more than treading water. In some countries indeed,people are still not being fed, clothed or shelteredadequately.Paradoxically, other nations face dramatic social andpolitical problems which result directly from theirincreasing economic prosperity.Tens of millions of would-be entrants to the workforce haveleft their close-knit rural communities to seek a betterlife in the cities. This is true throughout our region fromShanghai to Jakarta. The population of those two citiesalone are estimated to total some 42 million people by theend of this century.And in South Korea, for example, there is a clear connectionbetween the country's outstanding economic achievements andthe unfulfilled aspirations for greater politicalexpression.Ladies and gentlemenI have so far traversed just about the whole region. I haveleft to last a discussion of Australia's role in the regionand Australia's capacity to cope with change.I could not stand here, of course, and describe thechallenge of political leadership and economic adjustment inour region unless I were willing to meet that challenge inAustralia.I think there have been times in the past when PrimeMinister Lee, believing that Australians had protectionism in their blood, wondered whether we were beyond redemption.At the time of the ASEAN's consolidation and development andof the growth of the NICs a sceptical eye was cast onAustralia. But I can say with confidence that the era ofAustralian complacency of postponing the task ofadjustment is now behind us.Australia's economic history is replete with examples of apromising economic upturn cut short by an inflationaryspiral.In the old days Australians habitually found it hacd toreconcile their differences about how best to share thefruits of growth. Excessive industrial disputation was oneresult. Wage-push inflation was another. Poor economicperformance was yet another.But as I said at the outset, the constructive role ofenlightened self-interest has a central role to play insecuring sustained economic growth.In the Australian environment, that required each party tounderstand the role of income restraint and the need toencourage investment and job creation through mutuallysupportive economic policies.That is the approach which I have attempted to bring to mystewardship as Prime minister of Australia.It was the approach which underlay my calling of thehistoric National Economic Summit Conference immediately oncoming to office in 1983 an approach which promoted ashared understanding between competing groups and whichhealed the divisions and discords which had marred much ofthe seventies and the early eighties.Few would deny that the approach has worked well. Thepay-off has been an absence of wage push inflation, a morethan halving of industrial disputation, a consistent declinein the real costs of employing labour, sustained economicgrowth, a growth in jobs at twice the rate of the industrialworld, greater confidence in the stability of the Australianeconomy and an improved climate for investment.The Australian union movement now well appreciates theimportance to our future growth prospects of progressivelyhigher productivity.That awareness lies behind the current willingness oforganised labour to cooperate with management to reform workand management practices, to restructure Australia's economyto make it more outward looking and more internationallycompetitive, and to cooperate more closely with potentialnew foreign investors in Australia.A complementary change in attitudes has taken placeregarding protectionisin.Business groups in particular have come to recognise thebenefits to themselves and to Australia of an open tradingsystem. They acknowledge the role of reduced protectionismin improving their ability to export and to meet competitionfrom imports.one manifestation of this has been a general communityacceptance of the need to reduce gradually the protectionafforded to some of our least efficient industries in thecontext of industry specific plans.By the end of the current plan for the textile6, clothingand footwear industries, for example, Australia will be theonly country in the developed world not relying onquantitative restrictions on TCF imports.Another manifestation has been the recent call by businessgroups in Australia and New Zealand to go beyond theexisting framework of the Closer Economic Relationsagreement between our two countries.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..