FIGURE 4.11 Comparison of the Lag-1 autocorrelation for 10 stations on the Lower Mekong River, compared with 624global stations (data set compiled by Murray Peel).The large riversof tropical Africa, such as the Congo, haverelatively modest flood regimes in terms of unitdischarge, which is attributable to a combinationof low relief and less extreme tropical rainfallclimates.By comparison with many other rivers, thesize of the flood pulse in the Mekong is extremelypredictable. Campbell (Chapter 16) noted thatthe Cv of the annual flow of the Mekong atChiang Saen is only 0.2, while the worldwideaverage for rivers with catchments larger than105 km2 is 0.33 (McMahon et al., 1992). Furtherdownstream, at Pakse, the site closest to theCambodian floodplain, the Cv has dropped to0.16, less than half the global average.Even though the flood size is extremely consistentfrom year to year, this does not meanthat the size of the flood in one year is a goodguide to the size of the flood in the next year.The Lag-1 autocorrelation explores the relationshipbetween floods in successive years. Incatchments with high positive correlation, of0.6 for example, this would mean that the magnitudeof the flood in one year was quite astrong predictor of the size of the flood in thenext year. In general, the floods on the Mekongare only weakly, positively correlated with thefloods of the year before (explaining betweenHình 4.11 So sánh các Lag-1 tự tương đối với 10 trạm trên sông Mêkông, so với 624 trạm toàn cầu (bộ dữ liệu được biên soạn bởi Murray Peel).10% and 20% of the variation) (Fig. 4.11). Thismeans that the size of floods from year to yearis essentially independent of each other, whichis typical of rivers of this size.4. HISTORICAL CHANGES INHYDROLOGYDecadal variation in the hydrology of theMekong River provides context for exploringthe possible effects of both human impacts onhydrology, and climate change. The Mekongexperiences quasi-periodic discharge fluctuationsat an interdecadal scale. This fluctuationis visible in the annual Mekong dry-seasonflows at Vientiane (Fig. 4.12), particularly thesubstantial decrease in dry-season flowsbetween the 1940s and 1950s.Human impacts on hydrology can be classifiedas direct and indirect. The major directimpact on water volumes in the Mekong is diversionfor irrigation. Indirect effects are caused bydams and changes in land use, in particular theconversion of forest to agriculture. These impactscan alter the gross volume of water in the river,as well as the timing and duration of flows. Therehas been much speculation about the effect ofhuman impacts on flow regimes, but little investigationof the evidence, as described below.4.1. IrrigationRemoval of water for irrigation is the largestdirect hydrological impact on the MekongRiver. Simulations of a 20-year flow period for
the Mekong river basin indicates irrigation
water requirements of 13.4 km3 year, which corresponds
to a 2.1% and 2.3% decrease in the
mean annual streamflow at the outlet (Haddeland
et al., 2006). Half of the diverted water is
estimated to be lost via evapotranspiration,
and half returned to the river (Jackson et al.,
2001). While this is a substantial volume of
water, when compared with irrigation water
demand from other large rivers, this is a modest
diversion. For example, 37% of the total volume
of the Colorado River in North America is
diverted for agriculture (Haddeland et al., 2006).
Although the volume of water diverted for
irrigation is modest, it is important to note that
this diversion occurs in the dry season, when
the relative effect is greatest. For example, in
the delta at Phnom Penh in February, March,
and April, it is estimated that 60%, 45%, and
40% (respectively) of the flow is abstracted for
irrigation (MRC, 2003). It is worth noting that
the majority of dams planned for the Mekong
Basin are designed for hydropower generation
rather than for water extraction. The effect of
these dams will be to increase dry-season flows
(Podger et al., 2004) which could compensate
for increases in dry-season irrigation extractions.
4.2. Effects of Deforestation
Forest degradation in the Mekong Basin has,
according to Giril et al. (2001), been occurring at
an unprecedented rate and scale, particularly
from the 1960s onwards (Table 4.5). On the
Korat Plateau in Thailand, which includes the
Mun and Chi tributary systems, forest cover
was reduced from 42% in 1961 to 13% in 1993
(MRC, 2005). Furthermore, logging pressure on
the forests of Lao PDR, Cambodia, and Burma
was intensified after 1989, when Thailand introduced
a logging ban within natural forests, and
consequently sought increased imports from its
neighbors.
Two potential hydrological impacts of deforestation
might be distinguished:
1. Total water yield may be increased as annual
evapotranspiration decreases, and
2. Seasonal distribution of flows may be modified
as flood runoff increases and dry-season
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
