This year's most mystifying movie d

This year's most mystifying movie development is just how many otherwise intelligent people have been falling for this steaming pile of junk science and fake journalism from Morgan Spurlock.Spurlock won Best Director at this year's Sundance Film Festival by videotaping himself eating three meals a day at McDonald's for a month straight, while several outraged doctors charted the inevitable physical damage caused by such a frankly preposterous diet.I hate to give away Super Size Me's ending, but it turns out that if you stop exercising and start stuffing your face with nothing but crap fast food, you're probably going to get very fat and very sick.
"Where does personal responsibility end and corporate responsibility begin?" the director asks at the outset. Not a bad question. Too bad his film has no interest in addressing it. Spurlock throws up a series of irrelevant figures and mean-spirited man-on-the-street interviews, all the while carefully avoiding any serious discussion of the issues. For example, one short sequence showing the deplorable state of our nation's school lunch programs is quickly wiped off the screen to make room for more long segments in which Spurlock dances around in his red-white-and-blue underpants while rubbing on his new tummy and complaining about his "McStomach-ache."Given the obesity 3 epidemic 4 in this country, we need to start talking frankly about what we're eating (and how little we're exercising--a rather crucial side of the subject that this movie does not address at all). Yet most of Super Size Me is a not-so-amusing account of the filmmaker's rapidly declining health (though it should be noted that Spurlock seems to find his own jokes absolutely hilarious).Abandoning any interesting questions raised in the opening reel, Super Size Me quickly starts accusing the evil fast-food corporations. Here's where Spurlock undermines his own thesis, as I don't recall any McDonald's commercials saying that you should never eat anything besides their food, and I doubt many Americans actually live that way. So why did spurlock decide to base his film on such an absurd stunt? Because otherwise super size me wouldn't have had as much marketing appeal. Spurlock touches on serious issues, but his movie is all self-promotion, empty calories, and sugar shock. Ironically enough, he's made the documentary equivalent of fast food. Super size me is as childish and gimmicky as a happy meal,and nearly as indigestible

Kết quả (Việt) 1:

Phát triển phim đặt mystifying của năm nay là chỉ cần bao nhiêu nếu không người thông minh đã rơi xuống cho này hấp đống rác khoa học và giả báo chí từ Morgan Spurlock.Spurlock chiến thắng các đạo diễn xuất sắc tại Liên hoan phim Sundance năm nay của quay video mình ăn ba bữa một ngày tại McDonald's cho một tháng thẳng, trong khi một số bác sĩ giận dữ đã không thể tránh khỏi thiệt hại vật chất gây ra bởi một chế độ ăn thẳng thắn lố bịch. Tôi ghét cho Super Size Me của kết thúc, nhưng nó chỉ ra rằng nếu bạn ngừng tập thể dục và bắt đầu nhồi khuôn mặt của bạn với không có gì, nhưng crap thức ăn nhanh, bạn có lẽ sẽ nhận được rất béo và bị bệnh rất nặng."Where does personal responsibility end and corporate responsibility begin?" the director asks at the outset. Not a bad question. Too bad his film has no interest in addressing it. Spurlock throws up a series of irrelevant figures and mean-spirited man-on-the-street interviews, all the while carefully avoiding any serious discussion of the issues. For example, one short sequence showing the deplorable state of our nation's school lunch programs is quickly wiped off the screen to make room for more long segments in which Spurlock dances around in his red-white-and-blue underpants while rubbing on his new tummy and complaining about his "McStomach-ache."Given the obesity 3 epidemic 4 in this country, we need to start talking frankly about what we're eating (and how little we're exercising--a rather crucial side of the subject that this movie does not address at all). Yet most of Super Size Me is a not-so-amusing account of the filmmaker's rapidly declining health (though it should be noted that Spurlock seems to find his own jokes absolutely hilarious).Abandoning any interesting questions raised in the opening reel, Super Size Me quickly starts accusing the evil fast-food corporations. Here's where Spurlock undermines his own thesis, as I don't recall any McDonald's commercials saying that you should never eat anything besides their food, and I doubt many Americans actually live that way. So why did spurlock decide to base his film on such an absurd stunt? Because otherwise super size me wouldn't have had as much marketing appeal. Spurlock touches on serious issues, but his movie is all self-promotion, empty calories, and sugar shock. Ironically enough, he's made the documentary equivalent of fast food. Super size me is as childish and gimmicky as a happy meal,and nearly as indigestible