Le basic reflection concepts in 2D and 3D are the same but the implementation of 2D and 3D requiring an increase in the number of channels from 250 to 3,000. Due to an increase in the number of channels, the volume of incoming data is significantly higher, warranting a specialized onsite quality control and onsite processing for quality control. The number of channels per square km (sq. km) is far higher in 3D at 2,500 than the number of channels per line km (LKM) at 250 only in 2D. This translates into a more concentrated data per block and precise information mapping (visualized as a volume/cube). More statistical methods can be applied to a 3D technique across multiple parameters to provide quantitative interpretation. Due to these evident advantages, 3D is preferred over the 2D alternative