Confirmatory Factor AnalysisIn order to test the distinctiveness of the variables in this study, some CFAs were conducted to compare the fit of our hypothesized measurement model to a number of nested plausible alternative models. Due to the length of authentic leadership scale, the four dimensions were used as manifest indicators (‘‘Parceling’’; Kishton and Widaman 1994) of the latent authentic leadership factor. The same strategy was also utilized to the attachment insecurity scale, which was parceled as twelve indicators, and each indicator included three items which were randomly selected. Table 2 shows the results of the CFA that examined the distinctiveness of the study variables. As shown in Table 2, the fit indices revealed that the hypothesized six-factor measurement model was a better fit than any alternative nested models, showing support for the distinctiveness of the variables in the study
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..