In such a case, this wouldn’t neces

In such a case, this wouldn’t necessarily mean the end of NGO-driven Hybrid War, but just that someone else might be tasked by the administration to replace him and take over his worldwide network. The visible change that this could produce would be that the message that future “Soros”-connected organizations propagate in trying to gain more regime change recruits could decisively shift from the “far left” to the “far right”, especially if Trump’s CIA realizes that it’s a lot more effective to use this sort of narrative in exploiting the palpable zeitgeist than stubbornly sticking with a discredited and proven failure from the past. It’s still too early to tell if this will happen or not, but the scenario isn’t improbable and should at the very least be countenanced by all Macedonians seeking to predict the course of American policy towards their country.

If one accounts for the influence that Greeks will have on the Trump Presidency and acknowledge that Soros might very well end up on the losing side in his War on Trump, then it’s possible to forecast that the new American leader probably won’t budge on the name issue, yet won’t be as predisposed to resort to the same type of asymmetrical aggressions against Macedonia as his predecessor did. In short, Trump would be more reasonable than Obama, though he would still lean towards Greece if forced to choose. This is very relevant in terms of the bigger Balkan picture because it’s likely that the businessman will engage in his trademark deal-making in trying to reach a ‘gentleman’s agreement’ with Russia over establishing spheres of influence, and there’s no way that the Balkans would be left out of this proposal.

Kết quả (Việt) 1:

In such a case, this wouldn’t necessarily mean the end of NGO-driven Hybrid War, but just that someone else might be tasked by the administration to replace him and take over his worldwide network. The visible change that this could produce would be that the message that future “Soros”-connected organizations propagate in trying to gain more regime change recruits could decisively shift from the “far left” to the “far right”, especially if Trump’s CIA realizes that it’s a lot more effective to use this sort of narrative in exploiting the palpable zeitgeist than stubbornly sticking with a discredited and proven failure from the past. It’s still too early to tell if this will happen or not, but the scenario isn’t improbable and should at the very least be countenanced by all Macedonians seeking to predict the course of American policy towards their country. Nếu một tài khoản cho ảnh hưởng mà người Hy Lạp sẽ có trên tổng thống Trump và thừa nhận rằng Soros có thể rất tốt thúc bên thua trong cuộc chiến tranh của ông Trump, sau đó nó có thể để dự báo rằng các nhà lãnh đạo Mỹ mới có lẽ sẽ không budge về vấn đề tên, nhưng vẫn sẽ là predisposed để nghỉ mát để cùng loại bất đối xứng lúc chống lại Macedonia như người tiền nhiệm đã làm. Trong ngắn hạn, Trump sẽ hợp lý hơn so với Obama, mặc dù ông vẫn sẽ nạc hướng tới Hy Lạp nếu buộc phải lựa chọn. Điều này là rất có liên quan về hình ảnh Balkan lớn hơn bởi vì nó có khả năng rằng các nhà kinh doanh sẽ tham gia vào mình thương hiệu đối phó làm trong cố gắng để đạt được một thỏa thuận' quý ông' với Nga trong lĩnh vực ảnh hưởng của việc thiết lập, và không cách Balkan sẽ là trái ra khỏi các đề xuất này.