Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they cre dịch - Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they cre Ireland làm thế nào để nói

Some modern artists receive huge su

Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while other struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

According to Gordon M. Smith, who is senior economists from Harvard University at The United States, has conducted the reason why artists could lead in gigantic financial matter. It is because they have hard work and spent much hour at work. Not surprisingly, there is different amount of income with other people who have different occupation with low salary. What are the major contributing factors in the success of artists? Could governments make a balance this situation? Without further ado, let's delve into pro and contra of this issue.

The sound of art connects with uniqueness which is poured original creativity by artists and every single masterpiece depicts different soul of art. Because of that, many people are willing to pay for something that they are admire and would like to own. An artist gives something up to create a portrait, not only spent a lot of time, but also fulfill imagination. Leonardo da vinci, who painted legendary masterpiece portrait "Monalisa", took more than a year to finish it, but he got more than 2 billion dollars from selling his product, for instance. Whatever the reason, I would give an argumentation that government cannot prevent artist to earn much money from their products. There is a right of artists to get the worth appreciate from their creation such as money or popularity. However, public should consider what is something worth which is paid with higher amount, even there are many little known artists who find hard to earn income.

In the other case, well-known artists attempt to explore their ability as a business people to collect much money. They are not pay attention with quality, but money expectation is the main purpose. Popularity and reputation are the guarantee to sell a lot of products which give high income. This condition seems unfair to others unknown artists who are beginner to introduce they products with many obstacle to compete with other artists who have excellent reputation. Standing in contrast, popular artists have spent years for developing skills and experiences which are quite expensive things and cannot be bought by money. Every exhibition was improving their ability and skill to be expert and they have learnt from a mistake in the past, for instance. Thus this is fair that famous artists have got high nominal of their product.

Ultimately, the high income is a reflection of artists' effort and loyalty of art. Having said this, government cannot stop artists' creativity, because creativity is a right for all people who can think and show up their sense of art by painting or other art products. In my eyes, popular artists should pay attention of their product's quality to survive and compete with new artists in the future.
0/5000
Từ: -
Sang: -
Kết quả (Ireland) 1: [Sao chép]
Sao chép!
Faigheann roinnt ealaíontóirí nua-aimseartha suimeanna ollmhór airgid do na rudaí a chruthaíonn siad, cé go streachailt eile chun maireachtáil. Ba chóir do rialtais bearta a ghlacadh chun a réiteach an staid éagórach. Cé chomh dhéanann aontaíonn tú nó an easaontaíonn? Dar le Gordon M. Smith, atá eacnamaithe sinsearacha ó Ollscoil Harvard ag na Stáit Aontaithe, tá a rinneadh an fáth a d'fhéadfadh ealaíontóirí mar thoradh ar ábhar airgeadais gigantic. Tá sé mar gheall go bhfuil siad ag obair go crua agus a chaith uair an chloig i bhfad ag an obair. Ní nach ionadh, tá méid éagsúla ioncaim le daoine eile a bhfuil slí bheatha éagsúla le tuarastal íseal. Cad iad na fachtóirí a chuidíonn mór i rath na n-ealaíontóirí? Níorbh fhéidir a dhéanamh ar rialtais cothromaíocht an scéal seo? Gan a thuilleadh moille, a ligean ar delve isteach pro agus fritásc ar an gceist seo. Ceanglaíonn an fhuaim ealaíne le uathúlacht atá poured cruthaitheacht bunaidh ag ealaíontóirí agus léiríonn gach masterpiece amháin anam éagsúla na healaíne. Mar gheall ar sin, tá a lán daoine sásta íoc as rud éigin go bhfuil siad admire agus ba mhaith leat féin. Tugann ealaíontóir rud suas a chruthú portráid, chaith ní hamháin go leor ama, ach freisin samhlaíocht a chomhlíonadh. Leonardo da Vinci, a phéinteáil portráid masterpiece legendary "monalisa", ghlac níos mó ná bliain a chríochnú, ach fuair sé níos mó ná 2 billiún dollar a dhíol a táirge, mar shampla. Cibé an gcúis sin, ba mhaith liom a thabhairt ar argumentation nach féidir le rialtas cosc a chur ar an ealaíontóir chun airgead a thuilleamh i bhfad as a gcuid táirgí. Tá ceart ealaíontóirí a fháil ar an luach meas as a chruthú den sórt sin mar airgead nó tóir. Mar sin féin, ba cheart poiblí a mheas cad é rud is fiú a íoctar le méid níos airde, fiú tá go leor ealaíontóirí beag atá ar eolas a fháil crua ioncam a thuilleamh. I gcás eile, iarracht ealaíontóirí maith ar a dtugtar chun iniúchadh a dhéanamh ar a gcumas mar daoine gnó a bhailiú airgead i bhfad. Nach bhfuil siad aird a thabhairt le caighdeán, ach tá airgead ag súil an príomhchuspóir. Tá tóir agus dea-cháil an ráthaíocht a dhíol a lán de na táirgí a thugann ioncam ard. Dealraíonn an coinníoll éagórach do dhaoine eile ealaíontóirí anaithnid atá bunleibhéal a thabhairt isteach siad táirgí ag a bhfuil constaic leor chun dul san iomaíocht le healaíontóirí eile a bhfuil dea-cháil den scoth. Buan i gcodarsnacht leis sin, tá ealaíontóirí tóir ar na blianta a chaith do scileanna agus taithí a bhfuil rudaí daor go leor agus nach féidir a cheannach ag airgead a fhorbairt. Cuireadh gach taispeántas feabhas a gcumas agus a scileanna a bheith saineolaithe agus d'fhoghlaim siad ó botún san am atá caite, mar shampla. Dá bhrí sin tá sé seo cothrom go bhfuil ealaíontóirí cáiliúla a fuair ainmniúil ard a táirge. I ndeireadh na dála, is é an t-ioncam ard léiriú ar ealaíontóirí iarrachtaí agus dílseacht na healaíne. Mar sin féin, ní féidir le rialtas stop cruthaitheacht ealaíontóirí, toisc go bhfuil cruthaitheacht ceart do gach duine ar féidir leo smaoineamh agus a thaispeáint suas a n-mothú ealaíne péintéireacht nó táirgí eile ealaíne. I mo shúile, ba chóir ealaíontóirí tóir aird a táirge ar chaighdeán le maireachtáil agus dul san iomaíocht le healaíontóirí nua sa todhchaí.







đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
 
Các ngôn ngữ khác
Hỗ trợ công cụ dịch thuật: Albania, Amharic, Anh, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Ba Lan, Ba Tư, Bantu, Basque, Belarus, Bengal, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Bồ Đào Nha, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Corsi, Creole (Haiti), Croatia, Do Thái, Estonia, Filipino, Frisia, Gael Scotland, Galicia, George, Gujarat, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Hungary, Hy Lạp, Hà Lan, Hà Lan (Nam Phi), Hàn, Iceland, Igbo, Ireland, Java, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Kurd, Kyrgyz, Latinh, Latvia, Litva, Luxembourg, Lào, Macedonia, Malagasy, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Myanmar, Mã Lai, Mông Cổ, Na Uy, Nepal, Nga, Nhật, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Pháp, Phát hiện ngôn ngữ, Phần Lan, Punjab, Quốc tế ngữ, Rumani, Samoa, Serbia, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenia, Somali, Sunda, Swahili, Séc, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thái, Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ, Thụy Điển, Tiếng Indonesia, Tiếng Ý, Trung, Trung (Phồn thể), Turkmen, Tây Ban Nha, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Việt, Xứ Wales, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Đan Mạch, Đức, Ả Rập, dịch ngôn ngữ.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: