Application of waterjet in stone quarrying and processingRaimondo Ciccu*, University of Cagliari, Italy(*) Corresponding Author’s Address: University of Cagliari, DICAAR - Dept of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering, Piazza d’Armi, 09123 Cagliari, Italy, Phone: +39 070 675 5557 , fax: +39 070 675 5523, e-mail:ciccu@unica.itABSTRACTThe power of a jet issued at high velocity can be properly exploited for a number of applications instone engineering. In the quarry the interest is limited to particular situations like the undergroundextraction of granite block or in sandstone operations, whereas for marble the dominant technologiesare those based on diamond tools. Abrasive waterjet is currently used for contour cutting of stoneslabs where flexibility and accuracy are of a major concern. Finally waterjet, either plain or abrasiveladen, lends itself to surface finishing for which it proved to be superior to other rustic methods likebush hammering and flaming. The paper refers on the contribution to the scientific knowledge and tothe development of waterjet technology in the field of stone at the University of CagliariKeywords: Stone, Extraction, Cutting, Surface finishing,1. INTRODUCTIONHigh Velocity Waterjet can be regarded as one ofthe major advances in the field of materialdisintegration. Thanks to its inherent flexibilityand efficiency, the application has been rapidlyextended to many branches of industry forworking almost any kind of materials, from soft tovery hard ones.As regards rock engineering, hydraulic energywas first used for excavating soft rocks using lowpressure monitors. With the advent of the highpressure technology also harder rocks have beenmade amenable to waterjet treatment, opening anew era in mining, quarrying, civil engineering,mineral processing, waste treatment andreclamation.At present, waterjet lends itself to a variety ofoperations such as excavation, drilling, slotting,cutting, crushing and cleaning, alone or insuitable combination with mechanical tools. Theprospects have been recently enhanced by thedevelopment of abrasive jet technology,especially for precision cutting.2. WATERJET IN THE QUARRYThe only instance of industrial application ofwaterjet in the quarry concerns sandstone, owingto the very favourable textural characteristics ofthis kind of rock. In the Rothbach quarry blocksare extracted with a series of orthogonal slotsmade with a swinging jet lance at a cutting rate of6.5 m2/h (Figure 1)Figure 1. The sandstone quarry at Rothbach(France)Concerning marble there is no interest in waterjetsince diamond tools (diamond wire and rockcutter), are by far superior to any competitor onboth technical and economic grounds.As for granite, blocks are generally extracted insurface quarries according to bench methodsusing different cutting technologies (diamondwire, explosive splitting and wedge shearing).In the future, however, the possibility ofdeveloping the excavation underground isexpected to gain increasing popularity for anumber of reasons such as:· less impact on the environment;· no need for preliminary overburden removal;· better overall recovery;· possibility of working all year round in aprotected ambient;· economic use of left-out stopes.The access underground would consist of a largegateway tunnel, from which production activitycan be developed. The excavation of thegateway is made difficult by the absence of alateral access, since the only free face availableis the front of the advancing tunnel.All blind slots at the face can be opened withwaterjet according to a regular grid, whosegeometry is dictated by the size of the blocks tobe extracted.The hidden back face parallel to the front can beredeemed either by using flat hydraulic jacksintroduced into the waterjet slots or by cuttingwith diamond wire with the machine placed atone side of the drift as shown in Figure 2.Figure 2. Combination of waterjet and Diamond wire for the tunnel extraction of granite blocks.The association of waterjet with diamond wireoffers a very interesting solution for mechanisedquarrying, since both are able to work in acompletely automated fashion.3. CONTOUR CUTTING WITH ABRASIVEWATERJETAWJ technology is being increasingly used forcontour cutting of slabs in stone processingplants, whereas for straight linear cuttingdiamond circular blade is faster and cheaper,especially in the case of thick slabs. A typicalequipment for contour cutting with abrasivewaterjet is shown in figure 3.3.1. Conventional separation cuttingIn separation cutting the jet cuts through a givenslab thickness with only one pass.For a given machine setting (pressure, nozzleFigure 3. Waterjet cutting table at the DICAARlaboratories, University of Cagliaridiameter), experimental evidence has shown thatmaximum specific erosion, i.e. the surface cut bythe unit mass of abrasive (cm2/g) achievable atoptimum traverse speed of the nozzle is affectedby some relevant characteristics of the abrasiveused, such as micro-hardness, particle size andshape, density, as well as by the relativeproportion by volume of solids in water. On theother hand, specific erosion is also chieflyinfluenced by the hardness of the rock,depending on the operational conditions.It is worth underlining that the quality of the cutdepends on the traverse velocity of the nozzlethat must be kept slow enough in order to limitthe roughness and waviness due to spreadingand instability of the abrasive flow.The results of the investigation carried out at theUniversity of Cagliari show that peak specificerosion Es (cm2/g) can be expressed as afunction of a global parameter Pm accounting forthe different characteristics of the abrasive asshown in figure 4 for different materials taken into
consideration, including some rocks.
The structure of Pm is of the general form:
Pm = (Hm)a × (S)b × (r)c × (D)d × (P)e
where:
- Hm is the Knoop hardness [GPa]
- S is the shape factor of the abrasive
particles (dimensionless)
- r is the volumic mass of the abrasive
[g/cm3]
- D is the average particle size [mm]
- P is the proportion of solids in water by
volume [%o]
Figure 4 . Correlation lines of specific erosion as
a function of parameter Pm .
Exponents in the mathematical expression of Pm
have been calculated through a statistical
processing of experimental data by maximising
the correlation coefficient of the linear
relationship:
Es = K× Pm
Where K is a constant typical of each material,
obtained through the same computer procedure.
It was found that:
- exponent “c” and “e” are constant,
irrespective of the material;
- exponent “d” is constant equal to 0.3 except
for ductile materials;
- exponents “a” and “b” and coefficient K are
variable for the different materials.
Attempts have been made to express exponents
“a”, “b” and “d” and coefficient K as a function of
hardness that is believed to be the most
important material parameter capable of
describing its behaviour under the action of
abrasive waterjet.
The following remarks deserve some
consideration:
· An increase in abrasive hardness is always
beneficial, the more for harder materials,
whereas the advantage becomes less
important or even insignificant for softer
ones;
· also the shape factor is favourable, except
for the very hard porphyry rock, but the best
advantages of irregular particle shapes are
now for softer materials while for rocks the
gain is very poor, if any;
· regarding particle size, coarser particles
produce a better performance, although with
a decreasing marginal benefit;
· as for density, heavier abrasives are
increasingly detrimental for all the materials;
· finally, the influence of increasing the
abrasive load into a given volume of water is
always negative concerning the abrasive
efficiency, since specific erosion is inversely
proportional to the square root of the
solids/water ratio in the jet.
Therefore, although the most used abrasive is
garnet, cheaper and more efficient abrasives
should be preferred in particular cases like for
instance copper slag for soft marble.
3.2. Multiple pass strategy
In flat-bed contour cutting with abrasive waterjet,
a separation cut through a thick slab can be
made with multiple passes of the nozzle along
the planned profile at relatively high traverse
velocity. Since the relationship between depth of
kerf and traverse velocity is not a straight linear
one due to a gradual loss of efficiency of the jet, it
turns out that the overall time needed per metre
of cut and thus the unit cost of cutting can be
minimised by resorting to multiple passes. Of
course the quality of the cut surface is also
affected, either favourably or adversely according
to the particular conditions (figure 5).
0,00 R2 = 0,7868
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1,20
1,40
1,60
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Parameter Pm
Specific Erosion [cm2/g]
Perspex
Glass
Stainless steel
Marble
Granite
Alluminium
Basalto
Porfido
Results of cutting tests with abrasive waterjet on
a variety of materials clearly demonstrate the
advantages of using multiple passes at high
traverse velocity, consisting in:
· Reduced waviness except for heterogeneous
materials;
· constant cut quality over the entire area at
suitable conditions;
· almost zero trail-back;
· no significant taper;
· good separation cuts on either sides in case
of curved or angled section of the contour
profile;
· slow decrease in the incremental depth per
pass irrespective of the thickness of the
workpiece.
Figure 5. Features of surfaces cut with multi-pass
strategy on Granite (left) and marble (right)
The benefits offered by the concept of multiple
passes are much more important in the case of
complex profiles consisting of curved sections
and including angles, for which a deceleration of
traverse velocity is required in order to avoid the
problems related to trail-back, whereas this
measure is not needed in the case of multiple
passes. Moreover b
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
