The Respondents argue that count size-specific shrimp input values are not generally Apubliclyavailable@ in Bangladesh which is evidenced by the lack of count size data provided to theDepartment by interested parties to this case. According to the Respondents, the datacontained in the Respondents= September 8, 2004 submission is public data, because it hasbeen made publicly available by being placed on the public record of this investigation. TheRespondents argue that because count size-specific data is of critical importance, theDepartment must not apply an inflexible publicly available@ standard. The Respondentscontend that the peculiar facts of this case, and the need for count size-specific information,demand acceptance of the data provided in the Respondent=s September 8, 2004 submission.According to the Respondents, the Department
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..