The current worldwide growth rate of the aquaculture business(8.9–9.1% per year since the 1970s) is needed in order to cope with theproblem of shortage in protein food supplies, which is particularlysituated in the developing countries (Gutierrez-Wing and Malone,2006; Matos et al., 2006; Subasinghe, 2005). However, environmentaland economical limitations can hamper this growth. Especiallyintensive aquaculture coincides with the pollution of the culturewater by an excess of organic materials and nutrients that are likely tocause acute toxic effects and long term environmental risks(Piedrahita, 2003). For long, the most common method for dealingwith this pollution has been the use of continuous replacement of thepond water with external fresh water (Gutierrez-Wing and Malone,2006). However, the water volume needed for even small to mediumaquaculture systems can reach up to several hundreds of cubic metersper day. For instance, penaeid shrimp require about 20 m3 fresh waterper kg shrimp produced (Wang, 2003). For an average farm with aproduction of 1000 kg shrimp ha−1 yr−1 and total pond surface of 5 ha,this corresponds with a water use of ca. 270 m3 day−1. For a mediumsizedtrout raceway system of 140 m3, even a daily replacement of 100times the water volume is applied (Maillard et al., 2005). A secondapproach is the removal of the major part of the pollutants in thewater as is performed in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) withdifferent kinds of biologically based water treatment systems(Gutierrez-Wing and Malone, 2006). The amount of water thatneeds to be replaced on a daily basis generally is reduced to about10% of the total water volume (Twarowska et al., 1997). However, thistechnique is costly in terms of capital investment. While capitalinvestment costs for normal flow-through ponds systems are ca. 1.3 €kg− 1 annual production, they may increase to 5.9 € kg− 1 inrecirculating systems (Gutierrez-Wing and Malone, 2006).
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
