recent years further strengthen this point of view (Qu and Leung, 2006). In order to build good corporate information disclosure system, companies are encouraged to voluntarily disclose all the information that may have a material effect on the decision for shareholders. The proportion of independent directors on board may affect the level of voluntary information that company disclosed. Thus, we suggest there is some link between board composition and voluntary disclosure in Chinese companies. Compared with China, the quality of accounting rule is high in Sweden which means transparency in Swedish Company is high as well and they disclose more information in annual reports. When it comes to board, Swedish guidelines emphasize the main duty of the board is to improve shareholder’s interests and maximize shareholder value. This guideline, however, convey greater need for non-executive director representation in particular as firm size increases; meanwhile it makes recommendations on the size of the board. According to Törnqvist (1999), Multinational corporations have a particular important motivation for voluntary information disclosure is that more policy and future-oriented information may better influence investors in the context of growing globalization of securities market, therefore Sweden choose to reflect their strategic information as voluntary disclosure in annual reports. Thus, the association between board composition and voluntary disclose is highly expected in Swedish companies. We choose Chinese and Swedish companies as our research aim comes from our mutual interest. In the economy viewpoint, China’s booming economy makes us interests on what kind of voluntary information they will present. China’s stock market has been established since 1991, and it has developed rapidly as a booming market. Stock market development in China appears advanced relative to the overall level of economic development throughout the past two decades. The emergence and development of China’s stock markets can be regarded as one of the major achievements during China’s transition from a planned economy to a market economy. Until the end of year 2007, China has 860 companies listed on Shanghai stock exchange (SSE) market (China Securities Regulatory Commission, 2008). Compared with Sweden, Stockholm stock exchange founded in 1863 and then it was acquired by OMX in 1998 (wikipedia, 2008). According to information in OMX Nordic Exchange Stockholm, there are 270 companies with 306 shares traded in the Stockholm stock market as of July 18th, 2008 (OMX Nordic Exchange, 2008). In corporate governance point of view, Swedish companies they have longer history of corporate governance than Chinese companies. These two reasons for both economy and corporate governance viewpoints drive us to examine the differences of the association of voluntary disclosure between these two countries. In our review, prior studies had investigated the association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure among a variety of countries and areas, such as Australia, Singapore, China, Hong Kong, etc. Most of previous studies implied that more independent directors on the board disclosed more
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
