With a UPS receiver, you need never be lost again. Whether you are dri dịch - With a UPS receiver, you need never be lost again. Whether you are dri Việt làm thế nào để nói

With a UPS receiver, you need never

With a UPS receiver, you need never be lost again. Whether you are driving in a new city or climbing a mountain path, you can use UPS (Global Positioning System) to find out exactly where you are. In recent years, the development of very small and inexpensive receivers has made possible all kinds of other uses. Many cars now come equipped with GPS receivers and computerized maps to show where you are. Parents or pet owners put receivers on their children or their dogs so they cannot be lost. However, what makes GPS so usefill-the way it allows us to keep track of people and things-could also make it dangerous if it is used for the wrong purposes. Some organizations that are concerned about rights to privacy have argued that there should be limits to who can use GPS and for what purpose. In the United States, several cases have been brought to court to question the right of the government or private companies to track people "without their knowledge".

One important case came up in 2003 before the Supreme Court in the state of Washington. Under American laws protecting the right to privacy. the government or the police are not allowed to investigate a person's private life if there is no evidence that he or she has committed a crime. In the Washington case, the police had wanted to learn more about the habits of a man they suspected, so they hid a GPS receiver in his car. Lawyers for the suspect argued that this was illegal because it went against his right to privacy. The Washington Supreme Court agreed. In their view, hiding a GPS receiver in a car was like putting an invisible police officer in the back seat This was acceptable practice only if the police already had evidence that the suspect had been involved in a crime and if they had permission from a judge. Otherwise, it could not be used.

In 2005, another interesting case involving GPS was brought before the Supreme Court in Connecticut. This case involved a rental car company that decided to use GPS technology to prevent customers from driving their cars too fast. They hid GPS receivers in all their rental cars, which allowed them to know where each car was at any time. The receivers could also be used to calculate the speed at which a car moved from one place to another. If the car was driven faster than 80 miles per hour (120 km hour), the driver was charged an extra $150. Though the rental contract did mention GPS in very small print, customers were not told about it or about the extra charge. One customer who was charged 450 for speeding three times became very angry, and he decided to bring the rental company to court. In his view, the rental company had used GPS to spy on him illegally and the charges were unfair. The Connecticut Supreme Court agreed that this use of GPS was not acceptable and told the rental company to return the 450. According to the judges, the rental company should have informed the driver about the existence of a GPS receiver in the car and about the speeding charge.
0/5000
Từ: -
Sang: -
Kết quả (Việt) 1: [Sao chép]
Sao chép!
With a UPS receiver, you need never be lost again. Whether you are driving in a new city or climbing a mountain path, you can use UPS (Global Positioning System) to find out exactly where you are. In recent years, the development of very small and inexpensive receivers has made possible all kinds of other uses. Many cars now come equipped with GPS receivers and computerized maps to show where you are. Parents or pet owners put receivers on their children or their dogs so they cannot be lost. However, what makes GPS so usefill-the way it allows us to keep track of people and things-could also make it dangerous if it is used for the wrong purposes. Some organizations that are concerned about rights to privacy have argued that there should be limits to who can use GPS and for what purpose. In the United States, several cases have been brought to court to question the right of the government or private companies to track people "without their knowledge".Một trong những trường hợp quan trọng đến năm 2003 trước khi tòa án tối cao tiểu bang Washington. Theo luật pháp Hoa Kỳ bảo vệ quyền riêng tư. chính quyền hay cảnh sát không được phép điều tra cuộc sống riêng tư của một người nếu không có không có bằng chứng rằng ông hoặc bà ấy đã cam kết một tội phạm. Trong trường hợp của Washington, cảnh sát đã muốn tìm hiểu thêm về các thói quen của một người đàn ông họ nghi ngờ, vì vậy họ đã giấu một bộ tiếp nhận GPS trong xe hơi của mình. Luật sư cho các nghi ngờ lập luận rằng điều này là bất hợp pháp bởi vì nó đi ngược lại quyền của mình để bảo mật. Tòa án tối cao của Washington đã đồng ý. Theo quan điểm của họ, ẩn một bộ tiếp nhận GPS trong xe hơi là giống như đặt một sĩ quan cảnh sát vô hình ở ghế sau, điều này là chấp nhận được thực tế chỉ khi cảnh sát đã có bằng chứng rằng các nghi can đã được tham gia vào một tội phạm và nếu họ đã có sự cho phép từ một thẩm phán. Nếu không, nó có thể không được sử dụng.In 2005, another interesting case involving GPS was brought before the Supreme Court in Connecticut. This case involved a rental car company that decided to use GPS technology to prevent customers from driving their cars too fast. They hid GPS receivers in all their rental cars, which allowed them to know where each car was at any time. The receivers could also be used to calculate the speed at which a car moved from one place to another. If the car was driven faster than 80 miles per hour (120 km hour), the driver was charged an extra $150. Though the rental contract did mention GPS in very small print, customers were not told about it or about the extra charge. One customer who was charged 450 for speeding three times became very angry, and he decided to bring the rental company to court. In his view, the rental company had used GPS to spy on him illegally and the charges were unfair. The Connecticut Supreme Court agreed that this use of GPS was not acceptable and told the rental company to return the 450. According to the judges, the rental company should have informed the driver about the existence of a GPS receiver in the car and about the speeding charge.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
 
Các ngôn ngữ khác
Hỗ trợ công cụ dịch thuật: Albania, Amharic, Anh, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Ba Lan, Ba Tư, Bantu, Basque, Belarus, Bengal, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Bồ Đào Nha, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Corsi, Creole (Haiti), Croatia, Do Thái, Estonia, Filipino, Frisia, Gael Scotland, Galicia, George, Gujarat, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Hungary, Hy Lạp, Hà Lan, Hà Lan (Nam Phi), Hàn, Iceland, Igbo, Ireland, Java, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Kurd, Kyrgyz, Latinh, Latvia, Litva, Luxembourg, Lào, Macedonia, Malagasy, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Myanmar, Mã Lai, Mông Cổ, Na Uy, Nepal, Nga, Nhật, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Pháp, Phát hiện ngôn ngữ, Phần Lan, Punjab, Quốc tế ngữ, Rumani, Samoa, Serbia, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenia, Somali, Sunda, Swahili, Séc, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thái, Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ, Thụy Điển, Tiếng Indonesia, Tiếng Ý, Trung, Trung (Phồn thể), Turkmen, Tây Ban Nha, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Việt, Xứ Wales, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Đan Mạch, Đức, Ả Rập, dịch ngôn ngữ.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: