Data AnalysisFor analytical purpose

Data Analysis

For analytical purposes, the responses on the Likert-type scale were converted to numerical values (1 = strongly disagree, 6 = strongly agree) and treated as interval data. Measures of variance and central tendency were computed using SPSS (2003) for each statement. Consensus was determined when items achieved an 80% agreement of survey respondents between two response categories on the six-point Likert type scale. Indicators of team success receiving a mean score of 4.5 or greater were considered vital behaviors to team effectiveness. Items at the lower end of the scale--1.5 or below--were examined to determine if they might be considered barriers to team effectiveness and success.

For interpretation and reporting, the items were grouped into four levels based on the median response. Ratings of strongly disagree or disagree were grouped into the strong disagreement range. Items that received a mildly disagree response were considered to be in the moderate disagreement range. Items that received a moderately agree response were considered to be in the moderate agreement range. Responses of agree or strongly agree were grouped into the strong agreement range.

The variance for responses to each item was interpreted based on the middle range of responses. Consensus on a statement was agreed upon when 80% of the ratings fell within two categories on a six-point Likert scale. Frequency counts and percentages, along with the modes, medians, means, and standard deviations, were reviewed in determining consensus. Items not meeting consensus criteria were included in the following round, and new items were generated from suggestions. All written responses for support or disagreement with items on each round were reprinted in the next round. The Round III data were analyzed descriptively, and consensus items were identified. The mean for each consensus item was calculated, and variability was reported using the standard deviation. The mean was used to indicate the level of importance of the item as an indicator of team success in Extension program teams.

Kết quả (Việt) 1:

Data AnalysisFor analytical purposes, the responses on the Likert-type scale were converted to numerical values (1 = strongly disagree, 6 = strongly agree) and treated as interval data. Measures of variance and central tendency were computed using SPSS (2003) for each statement. Consensus was determined when items achieved an 80% agreement of survey respondents between two response categories on the six-point Likert type scale. Indicators of team success receiving a mean score of 4.5 or greater were considered vital behaviors to team effectiveness. Items at the lower end of the scale--1.5 or below--were examined to determine if they might be considered barriers to team effectiveness and success.For interpretation and reporting, the items were grouped into four levels based on the median response. Ratings of strongly disagree or disagree were grouped into the strong disagreement range. Items that received a mildly disagree response were considered to be in the moderate disagreement range. Items that received a moderately agree response were considered to be in the moderate agreement range. Responses of agree or strongly agree were grouped into the strong agreement range.Phương sai cho phản ứng với mỗi mục được diễn giải dựa trên tầm trung của phản ứng. Sự đồng thuận về một tuyên bố được chấp nhận khi 80% xếp hạng ngã trong vòng hai loại trên quy mô Likert sáu điểm. Tần số đếm và tỷ lệ phần trăm, cùng với các chế độ, số trung vị, phương tiện và độ lệch chuẩn, đã được xem xét trong việc xác định sự đồng thuận. Mục không đáp ứng tiêu chí thuận đã được bao gồm trong sau vòng, và mới các mặt hàng đã được tạo ra từ lời đề nghị. Tất cả viết phản hồi cho hỗ trợ hoặc bất đồng với các mục trên mỗi vòng đã được tái bản trong vòng tiếp theo. Dữ liệu vòng III được phân tích descriptively, và sự đồng thuận mục đã được xác định. Có nghĩa là cho mỗi mục đồng thuận đã được tính toán, và nhiều thay đổi đã được báo cáo bằng cách sử dụng độ lệch chuẩn. Có nghĩa là được sử dụng để chỉ ra mức độ quan trọng của mục như là một chỉ báo của đội bóng thành công ở phần mở rộng chương trình đội.