The biologist's role in society as

The biologist's role in society as well as his moral and ethical responsibility in the discovery and development of new ideas has led to a reassessment of his social and scientific value systems. A scientist can no longer ignore the consequences of his discoveries; he is as concerned with the possible misuses of his findings as he is with the basic research in which he is involved. This emerging social and political role of the biologist and all other scientists requires a weighing of values that cannot be done with the accuracy or the objectivity of a laboratory balance. As a member of society, it is necessary for a biologist now to redefine his social obligations and his functions, particularly in the realm of making judgments about such ethical problems as man's control of his environment or his manipulation of genes to direct further evolutionary development.
As a result of recent discoveries concerning hereditary mechanisms, genetic engineering, by which human traits are made to order, may soon be a reality. As desirable as it may seem to be, such an accomplishment would entail many value judgments. Who would decide, for example, which traits should be selected for change? In cases of genetic deficiencies and disease, the desirability of the change is obvious, but the possibilities for social misuse are so numerous that they may far outweigh the benefits.
Probably the greatest biological problem of the future, as it is of the present, will be to find ways to curb environmental pollution without interfering with man's constant effort to improve the quality of his life. Many scientists believe that underlying the spectre of pollution is the problem of surplus human population. A rise in population necessitates an increase in the operations of modern industry, the waste products of which increase the pollution of air, water, and soil. The question of how many people the resources of the Earth can support is one of critical importance.
Although the solutions to these and many other problems are yet to be found, they do indicate the need for biologists to work with social scientists and other members of society in order to determine the requirements necessary for maintaining a healthy and productive planet. For although many of man's present and future problems may seem to be essentially social, political, or economic in nature, they have biological ramifications that could affect the very existence of life itself.

Kết quả (Việt) 1:

The biologist's role in society as well as his moral and ethical responsibility in the discovery and development of new ideas has led to a reassessment of his social and scientific value systems. A scientist can no longer ignore the consequences of his discoveries; he is as concerned with the possible misuses of his findings as he is with the basic research in which he is involved. This emerging social and political role of the biologist and all other scientists requires a weighing of values that cannot be done with the accuracy or the objectivity of a laboratory balance. As a member of society, it is necessary for a biologist now to redefine his social obligations and his functions, particularly in the realm of making judgments about such ethical problems as man's control of his environment or his manipulation of genes to direct further evolutionary development.As a result of recent discoveries concerning hereditary mechanisms, genetic engineering, by which human traits are made to order, may soon be a reality. As desirable as it may seem to be, such an accomplishment would entail many value judgments. Who would decide, for example, which traits should be selected for change? In cases of genetic deficiencies and disease, the desirability of the change is obvious, but the possibilities for social misuse are so numerous that they may far outweigh the benefits.Có lẽ vấn đề sinh học lớn nhất của tương lai, vì nó là hiện tại, sẽ tìm cách để hạn chế ô nhiễm môi trường mà không cần can thiệp vào của con người liên tục nỗ lực để cải thiện chất lượng cuộc sống của mình. Nhiều nhà khoa học tin rằng tiềm ẩn của spectre ô nhiễm là vấn đề dân số thặng dư của con người. Sự gia tăng dân số đòi một gia tăng trong các hoạt động của ngành công nghiệp hiện đại, sản phẩm chất thải trong đó tăng ô nhiễm không khí, nước và đất. Các câu hỏi của bao nhiêu người có thể hỗ trợ các nguồn tài nguyên của trái đất là một trong tầm quan trọng.Mặc dù các giải pháp để những điều này và nhiều vấn đề khác chưa được tìm thấy, họ chỉ ra sự cần thiết cho các nhà sinh học để làm việc với các nhà khoa học xã hội và các thành viên khác của xã hội nhằm xác định các yêu cầu cần thiết cho việc duy trì một hành tinh lành mạnh và hiệu quả. Mặc dù rất nhiều người đàn ông của hiện tại và trong tương lai vấn đề có vẻ được thực chất xã hội, chính trị hoặc kinh tế trong tự nhiên, họ có chi nhánh sinh học có thể ảnh hưởng đến sự tồn tại của cuộc sống riêng của mình.