- Văn bản
- Lịch sử
A CASE STUDYTo demonstrate the four
A CASE STUDY
To demonstrate the four methods of schedule delay analysis discussed above, it is helpful to look at a specific case study. The schedule used in the case study is for a simple home construction project with an attached garage, which shares a wall with the house (see figure 1). The facts relevant to project delays in the case study are given below.
• The contractor encountered unforeseen rock at the start of week #2 while excavating the foundation, and was delayed 3 weeks. Before encountering rock, the contractor was on schedule.
• The owner stopped work on the house walls 2 weeks after the start because he decided he did not like the win-dows called for in the original design. The owner took 2 weeks to decide that the original windows were satisfactory, after all.
• The contractor’s framing subcontractor experienced financial problems and abandoned the job after working 2 weeks on the house and garage walls. At that time, both the house walls and the garage walls were 50 percent complete. It took 3 weeks for the contractor to get a new framer.
• The contractor did not order the garage doors until the end of week #11, which was 4 weeks later than the original late start date.
• The owner did not complete selecting finishes until the end of week #18, in¬stead of at the end of week #12 as planned.
• The contractor took 2 weeks longer than planned to complete the interior finishes.
• The contractor took 1 week longer than planned to complete the garage walls.
• When the garage doors arrived at the end of week #17 (already 4 weeks late because of the contractor’s late order), the owner changed his mind and requested different doors. It took 4 weeks to get the new doors.
To demonstrate the four methods of schedule delay analysis discussed above, it is helpful to look at a specific case study. The schedule used in the case study is for a simple home construction project with an attached garage, which shares a wall with the house (see figure 1). The facts relevant to project delays in the case study are given below.
• The contractor encountered unforeseen rock at the start of week #2 while excavating the foundation, and was delayed 3 weeks. Before encountering rock, the contractor was on schedule.
• The owner stopped work on the house walls 2 weeks after the start because he decided he did not like the win-dows called for in the original design. The owner took 2 weeks to decide that the original windows were satisfactory, after all.
• The contractor’s framing subcontractor experienced financial problems and abandoned the job after working 2 weeks on the house and garage walls. At that time, both the house walls and the garage walls were 50 percent complete. It took 3 weeks for the contractor to get a new framer.
• The contractor did not order the garage doors until the end of week #11, which was 4 weeks later than the original late start date.
• The owner did not complete selecting finishes until the end of week #18, in¬stead of at the end of week #12 as planned.
• The contractor took 2 weeks longer than planned to complete the interior finishes.
• The contractor took 1 week longer than planned to complete the garage walls.
• When the garage doors arrived at the end of week #17 (already 4 weeks late because of the contractor’s late order), the owner changed his mind and requested different doors. It took 4 weeks to get the new doors.
0/5000
A CASE STUDY
To demonstrate the four methods of schedule delay analysis discussed above, it is helpful to look at a specific case study. The schedule used in the case study is for a simple home construction project with an attached garage, which shares a wall with the house (see figure 1). The facts relevant to project delays in the case study are given below.
• The contractor encountered unforeseen rock at the start of week #2 while excavating the foundation, and was delayed 3 weeks. Before encountering rock, the contractor was on schedule.
• The owner stopped work on the house walls 2 weeks after the start because he decided he did not like the win-dows called for in the original design. The owner took 2 weeks to decide that the original windows were satisfactory, after all.
• The contractor’s framing subcontractor experienced financial problems and abandoned the job after working 2 weeks on the house and garage walls. At that time, both the house walls and the garage walls were 50 percent complete. It took 3 weeks for the contractor to get a new framer.
• The contractor did not order the garage doors until the end of week #11, which was 4 weeks later than the original late start date.
• The owner did not complete selecting finishes until the end of week #18, in¬stead of at the end of week #12 as planned.
• The contractor took 2 weeks longer than planned to complete the interior finishes.
• The contractor took 1 week longer than planned to complete the garage walls.
• When the garage doors arrived at the end of week #17 (already 4 weeks late because of the contractor’s late order), the owner changed his mind and requested different doors. It took 4 weeks to get the new doors.
To demonstrate the four methods of schedule delay analysis discussed above, it is helpful to look at a specific case study. The schedule used in the case study is for a simple home construction project with an attached garage, which shares a wall with the house (see figure 1). The facts relevant to project delays in the case study are given below.
• The contractor encountered unforeseen rock at the start of week #2 while excavating the foundation, and was delayed 3 weeks. Before encountering rock, the contractor was on schedule.
• The owner stopped work on the house walls 2 weeks after the start because he decided he did not like the win-dows called for in the original design. The owner took 2 weeks to decide that the original windows were satisfactory, after all.
• The contractor’s framing subcontractor experienced financial problems and abandoned the job after working 2 weeks on the house and garage walls. At that time, both the house walls and the garage walls were 50 percent complete. It took 3 weeks for the contractor to get a new framer.
• The contractor did not order the garage doors until the end of week #11, which was 4 weeks later than the original late start date.
• The owner did not complete selecting finishes until the end of week #18, in¬stead of at the end of week #12 as planned.
• The contractor took 2 weeks longer than planned to complete the interior finishes.
• The contractor took 1 week longer than planned to complete the garage walls.
• When the garage doors arrived at the end of week #17 (already 4 weeks late because of the contractor’s late order), the owner changed his mind and requested different doors. It took 4 weeks to get the new doors.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
A CASE STUDY
To demonstrate the four methods of schedule delay analysis discussed above, it is helpful to look at a specific case study. The schedule used in the case study is for a simple home construction project with an attached garage, which shares a wall with the house (see figure 1). The facts relevant to project delays in the case study are given below.
• The contractor encountered unforeseen rock at the start of week #2 while excavating the foundation, and was delayed 3 weeks. Before encountering rock, the contractor was on schedule.
• The owner stopped work on the house walls 2 weeks after the start because he decided he did not like the win-dows called for in the original design. The owner took 2 weeks to decide that the original windows were satisfactory, after all.
• The contractor’s framing subcontractor experienced financial problems and abandoned the job after working 2 weeks on the house and garage walls. At that time, both the house walls and the garage walls were 50 percent complete. It took 3 weeks for the contractor to get a new framer.
• The contractor did not order the garage doors until the end of week #11, which was 4 weeks later than the original late start date.
• The owner did not complete selecting finishes until the end of week #18, in¬stead of at the end of week #12 as planned.
• The contractor took 2 weeks longer than planned to complete the interior finishes.
• The contractor took 1 week longer than planned to complete the garage walls.
• When the garage doors arrived at the end of week #17 (already 4 weeks late because of the contractor’s late order), the owner changed his mind and requested different doors. It took 4 weeks to get the new doors.
To demonstrate the four methods of schedule delay analysis discussed above, it is helpful to look at a specific case study. The schedule used in the case study is for a simple home construction project with an attached garage, which shares a wall with the house (see figure 1). The facts relevant to project delays in the case study are given below.
• The contractor encountered unforeseen rock at the start of week #2 while excavating the foundation, and was delayed 3 weeks. Before encountering rock, the contractor was on schedule.
• The owner stopped work on the house walls 2 weeks after the start because he decided he did not like the win-dows called for in the original design. The owner took 2 weeks to decide that the original windows were satisfactory, after all.
• The contractor’s framing subcontractor experienced financial problems and abandoned the job after working 2 weeks on the house and garage walls. At that time, both the house walls and the garage walls were 50 percent complete. It took 3 weeks for the contractor to get a new framer.
• The contractor did not order the garage doors until the end of week #11, which was 4 weeks later than the original late start date.
• The owner did not complete selecting finishes until the end of week #18, in¬stead of at the end of week #12 as planned.
• The contractor took 2 weeks longer than planned to complete the interior finishes.
• The contractor took 1 week longer than planned to complete the garage walls.
• When the garage doors arrived at the end of week #17 (already 4 weeks late because of the contractor’s late order), the owner changed his mind and requested different doors. It took 4 weeks to get the new doors.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
Các ngôn ngữ khác
Hỗ trợ công cụ dịch thuật: Albania, Amharic, Anh, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Ba Lan, Ba Tư, Bantu, Basque, Belarus, Bengal, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Bồ Đào Nha, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Corsi, Creole (Haiti), Croatia, Do Thái, Estonia, Filipino, Frisia, Gael Scotland, Galicia, George, Gujarat, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Hungary, Hy Lạp, Hà Lan, Hà Lan (Nam Phi), Hàn, Iceland, Igbo, Ireland, Java, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Kurd, Kyrgyz, Latinh, Latvia, Litva, Luxembourg, Lào, Macedonia, Malagasy, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Myanmar, Mã Lai, Mông Cổ, Na Uy, Nepal, Nga, Nhật, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Pháp, Phát hiện ngôn ngữ, Phần Lan, Punjab, Quốc tế ngữ, Rumani, Samoa, Serbia, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenia, Somali, Sunda, Swahili, Séc, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thái, Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ, Thụy Điển, Tiếng Indonesia, Tiếng Ý, Trung, Trung (Phồn thể), Turkmen, Tây Ban Nha, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Việt, Xứ Wales, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Đan Mạch, Đức, Ả Rập, dịch ngôn ngữ.
- he move away from proprietary embedded o
- I want a lot of variety, such as sizes,
- That greatly influenced modern American
- tôi sẽ cố học tốt tiếng anh để hiểu bạn
- ways
- we can make it through
- fuck
- Many methods exist for schedule delay an
- How are things at Yodongseong?
- goog night
- bitter
- let's go ahead and do it now
- BÌNH TĨNH VÀ VƯỢT QUA TẤT CẢ CÁC VÒNG TH
- Anh yêu em mãi mãi
- Vy isn't the main actress for these pict
- i put up the picture
- co ay co doi mat to , tron , mau den
- niềm tin
- possessive determiner
- Many methods exist for schedule delay an
- Hop dong phien bang tat ca
- EM TEN DI
- I am honored.
- possessive determine
