Explaining the verdictJudge Mahmoud

Explaining the verdict

Judge Mahmoud El Rashidy said he dropped charges against Mubarak because Cairo Criminal Court didn’t have the jurisdiction to try him for the protesters’ deaths.

The judge said the case that prosecutors initially referred to the court listed only El-Adly and Mubarak’s former aides as defendants — not Mubarak himself.

But after mass protests pressured the prosecutor general to question Mubarak, a second referral was made to the court, and the two cases were merged into one.

Lawyer Hoda Nasralla, who represents the families of 65 slain protesters, said the inclusion of Mubarak in a second referral should have trumped his exclusion in the first.

“The judge shied away from directly acquitting Mubarak even though he was accused of conspiring with Adly, and Adly was acquitted,” she said. “The judge resorted to formalities instead.”

Kết quả (Trung) 1:

解释判决结果法官马哈茂德 El Rashidy 表示，他放弃对 Mubarak 的指控，因为开罗刑事法院没有管辖权尝试他对抗议者的死亡。法官说，检察官最初向法院提交案件列出只有艾尔德利和 Mubarak 的前助手作为被告 — — 不 Mubarak 自己。但大规模抗议施压检察长 Mubarak 的问题后，第二次转介到法院，这两个案件被合并成一个。律师甫田纳斯鲁拉，代表 65 杀害抗议者的家庭，说 Mubarak 列入第二次转介应胜过他排斥在第一。"法官羞于直接宣布无罪 Mubarak，即使他被指控阴谋与以权谋私和 • 阿德里被判无罪，"她说。"法官诉诸手续相反。"

Kết quả (Trung) 3:

解释判决

法官艾哈迈迪埃尔rashidy说他放弃起诉穆巴拉克，因为开罗刑事法院没有管辖权的尝试，他为抗议者的死亡。

法官，检察官最初向法院提交上市仅仅el-Adly和穆巴拉克的前助手的被告人不是穆巴拉克自己说
。
但是在大规模的抗议活动迫使检察官怀疑穆巴拉克，第二次转介到法院，及2例合并成一个。

律师Hoda纳斯罗拉，谁代表65名抗议者的家庭，说在第二介穆巴拉克列入应胜过他的排在第一。

“法官回避了直接采集穆巴拉克即使他被指控与严重，并严重被无罪释放了，”她说。“法官而不是诉诸手续。”